- The first amendment covers opinions in the editorial and only reflects the editor’s viewpoint. DCGLOBE/FAUX NEWS does not acknowledge or agree with the content of the editorials.
Recently, the UK appeals court upheld the decision of the UK Government who has revoked the ISIL bride’s citizenship which she achieved by birth.
This action may seem harmless, but the question remains about another British-born terrorist, such as “Alexanda Amon Kotey.” Since his parents are from Ghana and Greece, why was Jihadi George, aka “Alexanda Amon Kotey,” citizenship not revoked?
Jack Abraham Letts is a British-born white (Caucasian) convicted terrorist. He should have seen his citizenship taken away and sent to space, but he gets put due to white privilege.
Nobody wants to sympathize with these terrorists, but taking action on any race other than white almost resembles what former President Mr. Trump did when he banned travelers from Muslim countries. Also, keep in mind that many terror organizations will use this as a way to recruit new terrorists. These terrorists should be tried in the court of their respective countries and then incarcerated in their prison system.
Now the ugly part:
The decision to revoke the citizenship of Shamima Begum, a UK citizen who traveled to Syria to join the Islamic State (ISIL) group, was controversial and has sparked debate about the UK’s citizenship laws and counter-terrorism policies.
It is worth noting that the decision to revoke citizenship is a power granted to the UK government under certain circumstances, such as if a person’s presence in the UK is deemed “not conducive to the public good.” However, using this power is often discretionary and can be subject to legal challenges.
In the case of Shamima Begum, the UK government argued that her decision to join ISIL and her statements in support of the group made her a security risk and that her presence in the UK would not be conducive to the public good. However, some critics have argued that the decision to revoke her citizenship was unjust and that she should have been allowed to return to the UK to face justice and receive support.
Regarding why other Caucasian terrorists are allowed to keep their citizenship, it is worth noting that each case is unique, and decisions are made based on individual circumstances and assessments of security risks. It is not necessarily the case that one decision sets a precedent for all other cases.
In any case, the decision to revoke citizenship is a serious one that should be made carefully and following the law. It is important to balance the need for security with protecting individual rights and the rule of law.
